numbers dont win wars Royal Marines are fare better trained far better skilled and more physically demanding and mentally than usmc so please expain your typical sterotype that your president has told you wer the best when your not and that blshit obama said when hitler went to war who said no and
said america did no they never you flapped it us british stood against them you came in when you new if there was any chance we fall you would fall without a doubt
america had the worst war loses for the shortest battle time in ww2 so please expain how your better its beyond me or are you just saying your the best for sake of it we have proof and are reconised america is only reconised in numbers pathetic really
Firstly, how can you be 19 and have terrible grammar? I can barely make out what youre saying. Numbers dont win wars? That’s just ridiculous. How do you think the Soviet Union defeated Nazi Germany? Comparing the USMC to the Royal Marines is like comparing a dump truck to a pick up truck. A more comparable force would be the US Navy SEALs.
lol…worse war loses for the shortest amount of time? The United States military only lost 2.4 percent of all military forces. The UK on the other hand lost 5.2 percent of all military forces. The USSR lost 25 percent. How exactly did the US have the worse loses? So how exactly did we have the worse war loses for the shortest battle time?
“To have the United States at our side was to me the greatest joy. Now at this very moment I knew the United States was in the war, up to the neck and in to the death. So we had won after all!…Hitler’s fate was sealed. Mussolini’s fate was sealed. As for the Japanese, they would be ground to powder.” — Winston Churchill
Why do you think he would say that? He said it because the British could not win the fight alone. With the US on your side you could at least fight back.
The British forces have NEVER lost a war.
The only time the US win is when they are allied with another nation. But when the US try to help another they fail just look at nam. Britain maybe small but they have the worlds most powerful leader.
Firstly the US has won Mexican-American War, American Indian Wars, Grenada, Panama alone, and we were the single biggest factor in the defeat of the Japanese in WWII. Now how far do we go back with the British? William the Conqueror was a Norman and conquered England, you lost to Owen Tudor (War of Roses), First Anglo-Afghan War, and of course British forces lost the American Revolutionary War. The US helped the Koreans and Kuwaitis and didnt fail.
I see the great British – American “who’s got the bigger balls” conversation is up and running again. The only thing to note is that which ever force, US or UK, the men and women put themselves in harms way as instructed without comment. Deep respect to those members of both countries who face danger every day.
for fucks sake,America only joined the war because it felt that if Britain lost, it would have no other strong capitalistic country to ally itself th. In ww1, they only joined to insure that they would get their loans repaid by the British. Any way, how can u say that Britain needed ur help in ww2, we were the first country to stand against hitler and defeat him in the battle of britain. Englands borders are never to be infiltrated again
CONTINUED>.. England stood alone for the first 2 years of the war. we sustained more losses over a longer time, because we were in the war for a longer time u insolent prick. America only came into the war because of a government conspiracy with the Japanese. Pearl harbour, isn’t it just convenient that all aircraft carriers were away at the time, and that all ships that were harboured at pearl, were old and coming near their sell by date
ONTINUED>…. During the pearl harbour attacks, america was already building its new fleet, of ‘advanced’ submarines and battleships. And, also, my dad was a Royal Marine and there are no other worldwide unit as well trained physically and mentally for the British marines. If experienced ‘elite’ us men tried the initial marines test, only 5% would succeed, and that’s only the initial. So go f*** urself u Us ‘jerk-off’, LONG LIVE ENGLAND.
It has been stated and interpreted by many UK posters on here,that the USA didn’t enter WW2 and didn’t want to know.9 out of 10 Americans said no?Why?Because alot of them in the mid-west came from Germany and were very nationalisticThose who volunteered to fight for Britain, mainly came from British,Polish,Dutch and French backgrounds.The USA also would have done a deal with Germany,if Britain lost the Battle Of Britain.The USA wasn’t banking on the UK holding out.They should have been in in 39′
Also alot of US Navy personnel and merchant fleet personnel,who volunteered for the British war effort were American-Jews themselves.Those boys who volunteered and fought with us,I congragulate you all,if you’re watching this video.The argument about supplying us etc,etc:well guys,we need more than this,because you’ve got to enter the war,to help destroy the Nazis.Britain will always be grateful for the US aid,but they and the other allies,will never forgive the US government,for late entry.
This might be the wrong place to be asking this, but I’ve already tried looking everywhere else including the Official Royal Marines website.
Tattoos:
I realise that there is nothing allowed above the collar and below the wrist, but I have a few tattoos on my arms and am finishing my left sleeve next month, and applying around the same time. Would this count as enough reason to not accept me?
I am looking for an answer from someone that’s in or has applied to the marines.
hey mate, im halfway through the app and they dont allow above the neck or below the elbow unless it is very small and it cannot be offensive in any way
No problem mate.Its one of the few facts,that certain persons on here can’t comprehend,because its beyoond their abilities to do so.The truth actually hurts more,so its forgotten and re-written to justify political positions.
Your the type of guy i like on youtube! ( like me) you post good comments which are true. I hate finding all these “stupid” other comments.
your right about people not being able to comprehend ^^ xD
See ya m8
Fuck me… Are you serious, mate… Shit. I already have a considerable amount below the elbow on each arm. This is devastating news. I’m going to be on the phone first thing tomorrow. Thanks for helping me though. I’m in shock.
There are now enough resources in Afghanistan to deliver "tangible and lasting results," Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said during a joint news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. […]
Gen. Raymond T. Odierno put it very simply today, as he finished his address at the change of command ceremony for U.S. Forces Iraq. "Lion 6 - Out," meaning that the commander had finished using his call sign and was heading for his new assignment at U.S. Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Va. […]
Iraqi Army Soldiers conducted training Aug. 30 at Joint Security Station Deason in Baghdad, exhibiting their capability to secure a more stable and sovereign Iraq. […]
Loading ...
25 Responses
SemperFiLeathernecks
September 1st, 2009 at 6:19 pm
1THE USMC WOULD RAPE THE ROYAL MARINES
owlscraig
September 1st, 2009 at 11:41 pm
2in your dreams mate
JamesCunnyy
September 2nd, 2009 at 2:18 am
3numbers dont win wars Royal Marines are fare better trained far better skilled and more physically demanding and mentally than usmc so please expain your typical sterotype that your president has told you wer the best when your not and that blshit obama said when hitler went to war who said no and
said america did no they never you flapped it us british stood against them you came in when you new if there was any chance we fall you would fall without a doubt
JamesCunnyy
September 2nd, 2009 at 2:20 am
4america had the worst war loses for the shortest battle time in ww2 so please expain how your better its beyond me or are you just saying your the best for sake of it we have proof and are reconised america is only reconised in numbers pathetic really
Icarusdecending82
September 2nd, 2009 at 11:34 am
5Firstly, how can you be 19 and have terrible grammar? I can barely make out what youre saying. Numbers dont win wars? That’s just ridiculous. How do you think the Soviet Union defeated Nazi Germany? Comparing the USMC to the Royal Marines is like comparing a dump truck to a pick up truck. A more comparable force would be the US Navy SEALs.
Icarusdecending82
September 2nd, 2009 at 11:45 am
6lol…worse war loses for the shortest amount of time? The United States military only lost 2.4 percent of all military forces. The UK on the other hand lost 5.2 percent of all military forces. The USSR lost 25 percent. How exactly did the US have the worse loses? So how exactly did we have the worse war loses for the shortest battle time?
Icarusdecending82
September 2nd, 2009 at 11:47 am
7“To have the United States at our side was to me the greatest joy. Now at this very moment I knew the United States was in the war, up to the neck and in to the death. So we had won after all!…Hitler’s fate was sealed. Mussolini’s fate was sealed. As for the Japanese, they would be ground to powder.” — Winston Churchill
Why do you think he would say that? He said it because the British could not win the fight alone. With the US on your side you could at least fight back.
ChrisMansfield3run
September 2nd, 2009 at 12:21 pm
8The British forces have NEVER lost a war.
The only time the US win is when they are allied with another nation. But when the US try to help another they fail just look at nam. Britain maybe small but they have the worlds most powerful leader.
scenic456
September 2nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm
9Didn’t know they were that way inclined mate.
Icarusdecending82
September 2nd, 2009 at 2:06 pm
10Firstly the US has won Mexican-American War, American Indian Wars, Grenada, Panama alone, and we were the single biggest factor in the defeat of the Japanese in WWII. Now how far do we go back with the British? William the Conqueror was a Norman and conquered England, you lost to Owen Tudor (War of Roses), First Anglo-Afghan War, and of course British forces lost the American Revolutionary War. The US helped the Koreans and Kuwaitis and didnt fail.
dibsy74
September 3rd, 2009 at 10:14 am
11I see the great British – American “who’s got the bigger balls” conversation is up and running again. The only thing to note is that which ever force, US or UK, the men and women put themselves in harms way as instructed without comment. Deep respect to those members of both countries who face danger every day.
bnparyan
September 5th, 2009 at 10:23 am
12for fucks sake,America only joined the war because it felt that if Britain lost, it would have no other strong capitalistic country to ally itself th. In ww1, they only joined to insure that they would get their loans repaid by the British. Any way, how can u say that Britain needed ur help in ww2, we were the first country to stand against hitler and defeat him in the battle of britain. Englands borders are never to be infiltrated again
bnparyan
September 5th, 2009 at 10:28 am
13CONTINUED>.. England stood alone for the first 2 years of the war. we sustained more losses over a longer time, because we were in the war for a longer time u insolent prick. America only came into the war because of a government conspiracy with the Japanese. Pearl harbour, isn’t it just convenient that all aircraft carriers were away at the time, and that all ships that were harboured at pearl, were old and coming near their sell by date
bnparyan
September 5th, 2009 at 10:29 am
14ONTINUED>…. During the pearl harbour attacks, america was already building its new fleet, of ‘advanced’ submarines and battleships. And, also, my dad was a Royal Marine and there are no other worldwide unit as well trained physically and mentally for the British marines. If experienced ‘elite’ us men tried the initial marines test, only 5% would succeed, and that’s only the initial. So go f*** urself u Us ‘jerk-off’, LONG LIVE ENGLAND.
MarineAqua45
September 5th, 2009 at 10:56 am
15It has been stated and interpreted by many UK posters on here,that the USA didn’t enter WW2 and didn’t want to know.9 out of 10 Americans said no?Why?Because alot of them in the mid-west came from Germany and were very nationalisticThose who volunteered to fight for Britain, mainly came from British,Polish,Dutch and French backgrounds.The USA also would have done a deal with Germany,if Britain lost the Battle Of Britain.The USA wasn’t banking on the UK holding out.They should have been in in 39′
MarineAqua45
September 5th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
16Also alot of US Navy personnel and merchant fleet personnel,who volunteered for the British war effort were American-Jews themselves.Those boys who volunteered and fought with us,I congragulate you all,if you’re watching this video.The argument about supplying us etc,etc:well guys,we need more than this,because you’ve got to enter the war,to help destroy the Nazis.Britain will always be grateful for the US aid,but they and the other allies,will never forgive the US government,for late entry.
eddywtf
September 6th, 2009 at 11:19 am
17This might be the wrong place to be asking this, but I’ve already tried looking everywhere else including the Official Royal Marines website.
Tattoos:
I realise that there is nothing allowed above the collar and below the wrist, but I have a few tattoos on my arms and am finishing my left sleeve next month, and applying around the same time. Would this count as enough reason to not accept me?
I am looking for an answer from someone that’s in or has applied to the marines.
pimptastic666
September 6th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
18I would advice you ask at the recruiting office, if this is the job you want to it would be better to know rather than too late..
jonny160592
September 8th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
19hey mate, im halfway through the app and they dont allow above the neck or below the elbow unless it is very small and it cannot be offensive in any way
txrki
September 9th, 2009 at 11:34 am
20love your post!!! at last someone said that!!! xD
cheers bud
MarineAqua45
September 9th, 2009 at 2:55 pm
21No problem mate.Its one of the few facts,that certain persons on here can’t comprehend,because its beyoond their abilities to do so.The truth actually hurts more,so its forgotten and re-written to justify political positions.
txrki
September 10th, 2009 at 7:20 am
22Your the type of guy i like on youtube! ( like me) you post good comments which are true. I hate finding all these “stupid” other comments.
your right about people not being able to comprehend ^^ xD
See ya m8
eddywtf
September 10th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
23Fuck me… Are you serious, mate… Shit. I already have a considerable amount below the elbow on each arm. This is devastating news. I’m going to be on the phone first thing tomorrow. Thanks for helping me though. I’m in shock.
MarineAqua45
September 11th, 2009 at 6:58 am
24The same here and I find alot of these comments are written by ignorant retards.Okay then see you later.Bye now.
fatmanontherun
September 13th, 2009 at 3:53 pm
25wich has harder training?the sas or the RM?
RSS feed for comments on this post
Share your comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Military Link Exchange
My Thai Links
Combat Camera
Combat Cameras Goodies
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Follow Me
Favorite Links
Popular Terms
Bookmark Us
Meta